Display Accessibility Tools

Accessibility Tools

Grayscale

Highlight Links

Change Contrast

Increase Text Size

Increase Letter Spacing

Readability Bar

Dyslexia Friendly Font

Increase Cursor Size

Internship outcomes

Hannah Jeffery - Bayer CropScience
This summer, I participated in an internship with Bayer CropScience that completely lived up to my expectations.  I was assigned to work in a laboratory and collect moisture data on pollen taken from the field, but there were more things I learned in the two months I was there besides how to handle corn pollen.  I not only learned how to drive a Hagie (see below), but I also collected pollen from corn tassels, networked with Bayer and PowerPollen executives, scouted fields, and worked on a crop with no prior scientific experience. Since this was my first experience outside of academia, I was interested in the differences between academia and industry.  My advisor was knowledgeable about working for Bayer. By working with him, I came to understand that being a Ph.D. means working hard and investing time in the projects assigned, regardless of where we work.  Also, like academia, there is no 'faking it until you make it'!  Unlike academia, though, sometimes we do not get to see the projects to completion. This was the case for me, as I will not get to hear about the results of my work this summer.  Regardless, I feel more energized than when I started this internship about working in crop science. I enjoyed working with my colleagues, who all worked very hard and were passionate about their work.

Image of tractor
A four-row 204SP Hagie with a human for scale.  A fully assembled Hagie weighs about 13,000 lbs, or 6.5 tons!

Serena Lotreck - Corteva Agriscience

My internship at Corteva far exceeded my expectations. I had wanted to be exposed to careers in industry and determine if I thought it would be a good path for me, in addition to picking up new skills in programming, data analysis, and modeling. Not only did I form meaningful connections with my mentors, I also made connections across and outside the company that will lead to potential academic (postdoc) and industrial job opportunities in the future. I had the satisfaction of a very interesting modeling result in my project that may help my team allocate funding and manpower to a new project, and without my internship, they may not have found the time to do this modeling. I learned through experience the valuable lesson that I already knew in theory about biology-computational collaborations, that it is good to always maintain contact and communication with the biologists that provide the data. Several times throughout the summer, it was only by communicating effectively with the biological members of our team that I was able to figure out that bizarre trends in the data were actually the result of something mundane, like cows escaping and eating the crops in an experiment. I learned a host of new computational and modeling skills, and was able to work with new kinds of data. I also got to participate in some fieldwork, and tour other parts of the company’s operations. I continue in contact with my direct mentor, and will possibly collaborate further with Corteva scientists if I am awarded the Fulbright I applied for in Chile (March 2024 start date), a research proposal that was only possible thanks to this internship.


Joshua Kaste - Yield10 Bioscience

I did an internship in the summer of 2022 with Yield10 Bioscience. The company is based out of Massachusetts, but my work for them was computational so I was able to do the internship remotely. I worked with the company's Senior Director of Metabolic Engineering on a cross-species transcriptomic analysis of the oilseed crop Camelina sativa in comparison to its close relatives Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica napus. The goal of this work was to compare the transcriptomic profile of the developing Camelina seed with its relatives to identify potential targets that could be used to improve seed and oil yield in this species. By the end of the internship, this analysis had highlighted some potentially interesting targets for improvement. The work being done at Yield10 is closely related to my research, as my lab collaborates with them on a grant dedicated to Camelina improvement, but I enjoyed doing a different kind of analysis and looking at this system through a slightly different lens.


Robert Shrote - Wyffels Hybrids

I spent this past summer working as a plant breeding research intern for Wyffels Hybrids, a seed corn company. My main objective for this summer was to develop a “breeder’s eye.” For those who are unfamiliar with this term, a breeder’s eye is typically defined as the ability to visually assess a crop variety and determine whether it is good or not. A breeder’s eye is only developed through experience and is considered an art. Throughout the course of the summer, I learned that the aforementioned definition of a breeder’s eye is probably too narrow. There are many more facets to this skill than simple visual assessment of varieties. Based on my experience this summer, I would broaden the definition to include data quality control and decision-making processes which I would say both have artistic components to them.

Trainee Robert Shrote in the field
Robert Shrote in the field working as a plant breeding research intern for Wyffels Hybrids

I spent the first month of my internship traveling to different parts of Illinois, Iowa, and Wisconsin rating research plots on their ability to provide reliable data. Rating plots early in the season is crucial to ensuring good data inputs for downstream analyses. Analysis of low-quality data will ways lead to low-quality results. As I was rating plots, I was looking mostly for planting errors, skips, low plant counts, and uneven germination. In many circumstances, rating a plot is straightforward, but in some cases, the rating decision is more subjective. For example, if a research plot has a lower stand count than desired, but the plant spacing is uniform, the plants in the plot might be able to grow and compensate for the lower stand count. I also got to talk with several different breeders about how breeders go about making cross decisions. I have always been intrigued by this question, especially since most of my research revolves around studying the efficacy of different selection strategies. Going forward into graduate school, I have already begun to implement things I have learned from my internship with Wyffels Hybrids. When I arrived back at Michigan State University, one of the first things I did was rate my research plots for their ability to provide good data. In my future career, I will use what I have learned this summer to excel in my job.